The Second Wave of Pushback

[We are pleased to announce that our book, 7 Steps to Global Economic and Spiritual Transformation, is available online at Amazon and at Barnes and Noble. The follow-up volume (to be updated before print publication) is available online in four sections, beginning here.]

Peaceful protestors attacked by Trump's federalized mercenaries

We keep hearing threats of a second wave, if we don't wear masks, keep six feet away from other humans, and stop protesting. Recently, in violation of the Constitution—our current social contract—unindentified federal troops were deployed in Portland, Oregon, abducting peaceful protesters off the streets. While many, mostly those who identify with blue politics, see this as some aberration of democratic process, and while many, mostly those who identify with red politics, see this as a justifiable action in defense of the republic, neither side of the political party marketing brand charade is willing to face the inconvenient truth that their private clubs are operated by the same small group of financiers.

Without this context—knowing who controls the playing field and their objectives—partisan proponents are in the dark as to the nature of the agenda being played out in plain view. As we noted in our previous article, "Connecting the “economic reset” with the virus and racist events," there is a direct connection between the virus, racist, and fascist events to which we have been subjected, as well as the fabricated story of "Russian bounties on American servicemen in Afghanistan," the present shortage of cash and coins, the planned military enforced poisonous vaccines, the ludicrously rigged election cycle, and the economic reset.

All of this is part of longstanding plan on the part of the financiers, their ideologues, their executive and managerial corporate and civil servants (including the military and intelligence forces), as well as their witting and unwitting groundlings:

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. We would have found it quite impossible to develop our global project if we had been subject to the public spotlight during these years. But, the world has grown more sophisticated and willing to move towards a global government that no longer knows war, but only peace and prosperity for all of humanity. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national self-determination practiced in past centuries." —David Rockefeller, June 5, 1991, in an address to the Bilderberger meeting in Baden Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton), as reported and translated from the September, 1991, issue of the Monte Carlo-based Hilaire du Berrier Report (also reported elsewhere in the French press, including Minutes, June 19, 1991 and Lectures Francaises, July/August, 1991). Mr. Du Berrier closely followed and chronicled the activities of Bilderberg and its overlapping groups, for over four decades.

"Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." —David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 2003.

"The nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state." —Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, 1971.

On May 17th, 2020, our article, "The Virus Event and the Rockefeller Foundation Plan," detailed the cartel's scenarios for maintaining global control, as described in the foundation's 2010 white paper, "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development." Many of these "scenarios" have come to pass, as well as the strategies contained in the foundation's April 2020 publication, "National Covid-19 Testing Action Plan Pragmatic steps to reopen our workplaces and our communities," outlining their prescriptive response to their own manufactured virus event.

Since that time, the 2010 Rockefeller Foundation white paper has been shared around the world, necessitating an increased effort by the cartel to suppress such information and the reactions it is causing, having added fuel to the fire of the #BlackLivesMatter protests, as well as a growing disregard for the preposterous inflation of Covid-19 cases and deaths, with its attendant #CorporateStateScience protocols—masks and social distancing—leveraged as means to suppress pushback.

As Rockefeller and Brzezinski indicated above, the political and corporate structure of the U.S., U.K., France, et cetera is corporate control over the state, one of the textbook definitions of fascism, to which there is no current electoral solution, as evidenced by the blue party 2020 primary charade and the rigging of entire 2016 electoral process.

Mercenaries contracted by the corporate state,
much as the British financiers did to fight the American colonists with Hessian soldiers.

Our future freedom now depends upon our own second wave of pushback to the explicit fascist repression now being carried out in Portland and, if cartel and their puppet, Donald Trump, have their way with illegally deployed federal stormtroopers, across the nation. Other than the tepid responses by elected officials in Oregon (and here), the only pushback is a lawsuit by the ACLU in Oregon and a response by Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, who threatened all those involved in this Nazi-style operation: "Anyone, including federal law enforcement, who unlawfully assaults and kidnaps people will face criminal charges from my office."

Perhaps the cartel has chosen to introduce martial law in blue-party marketing brand cities because if they tried it in red-party marketing brand cities, a local county sheriff might remind them who is the law in his/her domain. But with (the occasionally strict constitutionalist) Justice Antonin Scalia conveniently out of the way, there is no one on the Supreme Court to remind us that the federal government has far exceeded the expressed powers granted to it by the states via their groundless claim that such overreach is justified through the commerce clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3).

It's time for the true left to come to grips with 2nd Amendment and admit the situation we are now facing is the actual reason it was put in the Constitution—to prevent the federal government (like the British before them) from exceeding its authority and abridging the rights of the states and individuals granted by the Constitution, particularly the Bill of Rights. Certainly, true states' militias (not the National Guard, which is federal) should be deployed to defend citizens from these terrorist attacks directed by the Anglo-Euro-American banking cartel, which includes foreign nationals, who control our federal government. Recent actions in Virginia against gun control by a "militia" composed of both "left" and "right" parties shows this can be done (and here).

After all, since the governors claim the right to abridge the Bill of Rights is constitutional (by ordering businesses closed and mandating masks and social distancing), then they are also capable of organizing their own militias (which is an actual Constitutional provision) and telling the feds to get lost. Of course, the present set of governors serve corporate interests, but they have just demonstrated that they are empowered to protect the states from federal terrorism, if we are able to make that stick.