Both the Republicans and the Democrats are owned by the central bankers. That the Democrats use "equality" (which is a good thing) as their "loss leader" does not make them any less culpable than the Republicans, who use inequality to bring their customers in the door. Equality only makes us equal debt slaves of the bankers; equality is not freedom.
During the Gilded Age, when the Robber Barons were more forthcoming about their contempt for the masses, they came right out and said this:
"We must keep the people busy with political antagonisms. We’ll therefore speed up the question of (fill in the blank) within the Democratic Party; and we’ll put the spotlight on (fill in the blank) [for] the Republican Party. By dividing the electorate in this way, we’ll be able to have them spend their energies at struggling amongst themselves on questions that, for us, have no importance whatsoever." --US Bankers magazine, 1892 (Sarah E. Van De Vort Emery, "Imperialism in America: Its Rise and Progress," Emery & Emery, 1893, pp. 71-72, as quoted in the Chicago Daily Press)
To put this into perspective, the plan from the beginning, during both the red and blue nomination processes, was to find a way to keep the left and the right in the blue and red folds, so that no third party candidates would receive the requisite 5% of the vote to get on all federal ballots the next time around.
Imagine being at the top of the power pyramid: you own the central banks, including the Federal Reserve, which backs up the EU Central Bank. You own almost all the key corporate assets on the planet (as a result of owning the world reserve currency), as well as control almost all the key governments and their military and intelligence operations. This means you also control the media, the polling organizations, and the electronic voting machines.
In return for millions of dollars in speaking fees, Hillary Clinton has been a good foot soldier for you (which is why she won’t release her speeches to the banks), she prosecutes wars for profit, supports fracking, supports the TPP (which is why the State Department won’t release her speeches on this subject), supports GMOs, and virtually every other corporate initiative to take over the world, poison our minds and bodies, and reduce the population. She is a long-time member of the Bilderberger Group. So, she was clearly the choice of the cartel since the beginning.
But how to make Hillary palatable to the voters, after a career supporting the criminal objectives of the .00001%? First, get the left on board with Sanders (who, it is now clear, is part of the red and blue charade), and then--via payola to super-delegates, plus voter suppression, hacked voter registrations, and hacked voting machines--steal the nomination from him. During the entire process, have your pseudo-leftist cheerleaders (Elizabeth Warren, Robert Reich, Daily Kos, etc.) pretend to support him, knowing all the while that he can’t win, because the election is hacked. Then, after declaring Clinton the victor, have your cheerleaders (plus Bernie himself!) attempt to convince the left that they need to vote for Clinton, to save the world from Trump, a two-bit fascist clown previously on record as stating Clinton would make an excellent President, who will make the covert fascist Clinton look like a liberal and a feminist. And did we mention that Trump's candidacy is part of Clinton's plan (now verified by WikiLeaks)?
And yes, we are being set up for another red-blue gridlock, with a pseudo liberal in the White House and pseudo conservatives in control of the Congress. We can also expect that Clinton, like Obama, will nominate a pseudo conservative to the Supreme Court, with the excuse that anyone else would not get confirmed. This set up (blue White House, red Congress and Supreme Court) works well for the puppet masters, the international banking cartel, since all legislation is skewed to the right, to enable the objectives of the self-described "New World Order" (David Rockefeller's and G.H.W. Bush's words): corporate control over the state--one of the textbook definitions of fascism.
If there is anything to be thankful for regarding this scheme is that Sanders garnered such a vast plurality in so many states, that the cartel had to be egregiously blatant in its criminal suppression and hacking of the vote. As a result, it has become obvious to many that the blue-red charade is no longer a viable game. Given the cartel’s control over the voting process, the only value of voting (other than paying for independent exit polls to reveal the discrepancies) is to show them that we are not playing their game.
Of course, we do need a better strategy than protest voting, and at the present time, working for third-party candidates is the best way to do this, because it furthers the education of the electorate. What we find is that there are plans and programs being promoted that are actually better than what Sanders offered, namely that of the Green Party and its Presidential nominee, Jill Stein.
First, consider that Sanders’ position on the out-of-control financial industry is to “break up the big banks” and “reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act” (which separated commercial and investment banking). Neither of these would change the power structure nor the extremely unequal distribution of income and assets. Remember when the “Trust Busters” broke up John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil into 31 pieces? The Rockefeller Trusts ended up owning all the pieces. So, what Sander’s plan would do is keep the power structure as it is, while imposing an old set of regulations, which perhaps slowed down the rate of theft.
But regulations mean nothing to the banks. Their business model is fraud: steal hundreds of billions or millions of dollars; force meaningless settlements for mills on the dollar (which simply become a small “cost of doing business” expense) from regulators who are on their dole; and then repeat. In other words, breaking the law is the way the cartel rolls. How many top-level bank executives went to jail for the crimes committed against world markets? None.
What crimes?
• Rigging LIBOR (worldwide interest rates for all debt instruments, including loans, mortgages, and credit cards.1
• Illegally purchasing U.S. Treasury bonds to keep the government solvent.2
• Manipulating the price of gold and other commodities.3
• Rigging the municipal bond market.4
• Falsifying mortgage securities data to destroy the housing market and reduce home ownership5
• Selling derivatives to public sector organizations and then manipulating markets to create further indebtedness.6
• Manipulating U.S. stock markets.7
• Money laundering8
• Shielding clients from U.S. taxes9
Let us be clear, this list was accumulated entirely during the presidency of Barak Obama, though it could just as well have been George W. Bush. They are both owned and operated by the cartel. For Obama's first term, Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State, overseeing various wars and threats that are standard operating procedure for the cartel, including the policy of using drones to bomb children.
To those who would argue that we should vote for Clinton to save the world from Trump, we can only say that Hillary Clinton is a fascist, not a feminist nor a liberal. In a just world, she would be in jail for war crimes, to say nothing of all the lesser charges of a series of voter and national security crimes.
She embodies U.S. fascism in a way that Trump never could; she takes money directly from the international banking cartel (while refusing to publicly release her speeches to them) and gleefully carries out their wars, murdering second and third world populations; she is for fracking; she supports the TPP (a corporate takeover of nations), despite what she says, which is why the State Department has embargoed her emails on the subject; she supports private, for-profit prisons; and she stole the blue party nomination through criminal voter suppression, anti-democratic and illegal caucus maneuvers, and (according to the exit polls) the hacking of electronic voting machines. Like the bankers who own her, Clinton has a get out of jail free card. In a fascist state, escaping criminal conviction does not mean that the defendant is not guilty.
"Give me control over a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
--Apocryphal, attributed to Meyer Amschel Rothschild, patriarch of the infamous banking family
If it's any consolation, when they appoint Clinton or, for some unforeseen reason, Trump, there are over twenty layers of top secret clearance above the POTUS, and we will have the same wars under Clinton or Trump as we had with Bush and Obama. The POTUS is there to read the TelePrompTer and create contrasting red-blue party branding.
But even Sanders, despite all the good vibes for regathering the progressive troops, was, when you get down to the nitty-gritty, not offering a viable alternative. There would not be enough money with his plan to pay for all the good things he proposed, because the too-big-to-fail banks would still own the Federal Reserve, and thus still manipulate the money supply and the markets, refuse to pay taxes, and continue their wars against the world, including America’s 99%.
If the movement is really interested in change, and if the movement can overcome subversion from the cartel’s agent provocateurs and saboteurs, then it needs to focus on the sine qua non of change: regaining our sovereignty by taking back control of our central bank and issuing real U.S. dollars, which would do away with the so-called national debt in short order. Once the source of the cartel’s power is removed, then would it be possible to end profiteering on wars, healthcare, and education, as well as institute verifiable elections and a decentralized media. Then, a new world--that includes food, clothing, shelter, healthcare, and education for everyone--would be possible and eminently affordable.
This is the blueprint that you will find in the Green New Deal. Let the revolution continue.
Footnotes:
1 http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/06/27/barclays-said-to-settle-regulatory-claims-over-benchmark-manipulation/ and http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/jul/13/libor-scandal-banking-inquiry-whitewash, http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/28/us-sec-rbs-stein-idUSBREA3R1AU20140428, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/business/dealbook/deutsche-bank-settlement-rates.html, and http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2015/07/libor-historys-largest-financial-crime-that-the-wsj-and-nyt-would-like-you-to-forget.html#more-9571
2 http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/09/is-treasury-faking-foreign-purchases-of.html, http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/05/12/fed-great-deceiver-paul-craig-roberts/, http://www.dailypaul.com/320958/fed-update-buys-60-of-us-govt-deficit-in-2014, and http://truth-out.org/news/item/9876-the-jpmorgan-derivatives-propping-up-us-debt-why-the-senate-wont-touch-jamie-dimon
3 http://www.activistpost.com/2014/01/the-hows-and-whys-of-gold-price.html, http://www.globalresearch.ca/financial-criminality-wall-street-manipulates-energy-prices-gold-and-every-other-market/5380325, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/21/business/a-shuffle-of-aluminum-but-to-banks-pure-gold.html, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/15/business/wall-st-exploits-ethanol-credits-and-prices-spike.html, http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/senate-report-criticizes-goldman-and-jpmorgan-over-their-roles-in-commodities-market/, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-15/eu-oil-manipulation-probe-shines-light-on-platts-pricing-window.html, and http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/07/30/jpmorgan-to-pay-410-million-in-power-market-manipulation-case/
4 http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-scam-wall-street-learned-from-the-mafia-20120620#ixzz1yS3rPeCP, http://www.maxkeiser.com/2015/02/swimming-with-the-sharks-goldman-sachs-school-districts-and-capital-appreciation-bonds/, http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/editorial/bs-ed-libor-20120716,0,968211.story
5 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/12/attorney-general-foreclosure-settlement-eric-schneiderman-beau-biden_n_1202643.html, http://www.housingwire.com/articles/33130-doj-fines-jpmorgan-chase-50-million-for-robo-signing, http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/bank-of-america-s-16-8-billion-mortgage-fraud-agreement-is-another-public-relations-stunt, http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2015/02/03/s-p-announces-1-37-billion-settlement-with-prosecutors/
6 http://www.forbes.com/sites/halahtouryalai/2012/07/11/city-of-oakland-taps-occupy-wall-street-to-take-on-goldman-sachs/, http://www.law.com/jsp/pa/PubArticlePA.jsp?hubtype=ThisWeek&id=1202612875031&slreturn=20130629162925, http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/everything-is-rigged-the-biggest-financial-scandal-yet-20130425, and http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/10/business/staking-1-billion-that-herbalife-will-fail-then-ackman-lobbying-to-bring-it-down.html
7 http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/gangster-bankers-too-big-to-jail-20130214 and http://www.opednews.com/articles/THE-U-S-STOCK-MARKET-IS-R-by-lila-york-101227-303.html and http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/computerized_front_running.php
9 ttp://truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/swiss-banking-giant-helped-us-1-evade-taxes-on-billions-of-dollars-but-justice-department-hasn-t-prosecuted, http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/feb/08/hsbc-files-expose-swiss-bank-clients-dodge-taxes-hide-millions, http://www.sanders.senate.gov/top-10-corporate-tax-avoiders, and http://www.dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/05/19/credit-suisse-set-to-plead-guilty-in-tax-evasion-case/
Copyright, Robert Bows, 2016
# # #
[We are pleased to announce that our book, 7 Steps to Global Economic and Spiritual Transformation, is now available online at Amazon and at Barnes and Noble.]
No comments:
Post a Comment