The lords of misrule
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. We would have found it quite impossible to develop our global project if we had been subject to the public spotlight during these years. But, the world has grown more sophisticated and willing to move towards a global government that no longer knows war, but only peace and prosperity for all of humanity. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national self-determination practiced in past centuries." --David Rockefeller, June 5, 1991, in an address to the Bilderberger meeting in Baden Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton), as reported and translated from the September, 1991, issue of the Monte Carlo-based Hilaire du Berrier Report (also reported elsewhere in the French press, including Minutes, June 19, 1991 and Lectures Francaises, July/August, 1991). Mr. Du Berrier closely followed and chronicled the activities of Bilderberg and its overlapping groups, for over four decades.
Thus, forty-seven years after the Bretton Woods Conference set up Federal Reserve Notes to become the world reserve currency, David Rockefeller declared that the self-described "New World Order" (NWO) had sewn up control over the planet. Given the various illicit means by which this plutocracy seized power, it is fitting that we revisit the premise of the Nuremberg Trials:
"If certain acts and violations of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them. We are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us." --U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, the chief prosecutor of the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials following World War II
The crimes of the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, and less than a dozen other families--that sit atop the pyramid of control over almost all of the world's corporations (including the mass media and voting machines), governments (including military and intelligence operations), and natural resources--are numerous, including:
* Crimes against humanity
* Treason
* Murder
* Racketeering and fraud
* Conspiracy
Given that no one from the .00001% has ever been tried for their crimes, we must consider how they came to control the legal system, before we can offer a strategy for the re-establishment law and scientific method governed by the power of reasoning, not by the exigencies of capital.
Ask not for whom the gavel tolls; it tolls for thee
In the U.S.A., a common assumption regarding the operations of its legal system is that the courts represent an independent branch of a sovereign government. However, as we detailed in the previous chapter, our government is nothing more than a public sector subsidiary of the international banking cartel and their corporations.
Along the same historical timeline and by similar insidious means through which the cartel gained political power--that is, via privately owned central banks and currencies--in Great Britain, Europe, and the U.S., we find that they also gained legal power and control over what is held up as rational thought, particularly law and science.
How the banking crime syndicate went legit
A lot has been written on this subject, much of it speculative, involving the fealty of attorneys worldwide to the City of London, an independent financial district in the heart of Great Britain's capital city. Nevertheless, the lack of documentation for these arguments does not mean that the international banking cartel has not gained control over most of the world's legal systems; rather, observing the process from a different point-of-view, we find that there are many means by which cartel has gained control over legal systems, including:
* Diverting the law from protecting citizen's rights (labor) to protecting corporate rights (capital); that is, turning the criminal code into the code of criminals;
* Enabling court procedures for attorneys and denying them to others (see illustration below);
* Enforcing their version of the law through assassinations, economic sabotage, famine, war, election theft, bribery, racketeering, internationalization of the military and police, etc.; and
* Obfuscating the law, through complexity and legerdemain.
Let's look at the entities involved in the struggle for "legal" control of this country:
* The United States of America: A confederation of sovereign states that grants certain rights to a federal government, which (only theoretically, at this time) serves at the pleasure of and in the interests of these states.
* Statutory code: The revised statutes of the individual and severable United States of America, for example, the Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS).
* The United States: The federal government, originally created by representatives presuming to act in the interests of the United States of America.
* U.S. Code: United States Code (USC), i.e., the laws of the federal government.
The interplay between the legal codes for United States of America (U.S.A.) and the United States (U.S.), along with the actions of the international banking cartel, are the central dialectic to the history of this country, beginning in colonial times and continuing to the present.
The Constitution as a Coup d'Etat
When the Constitution of the United States of America was put into action in 1788, without the unanimous consent required by the Articles of Confederation, it ceded certain powers, previously exclusive to the states, to the federal government, with all other rights, expressed and unexpressed, remaining exclusive to the states; and yet, the cartel has seen to it that these powers of the federal government (the U.S.) have been expanded to give it increasing control over the states (the U.S.A.). Here's how they did it.
In the Articles of Confederation, enacted in 1781, the Congress ("the United States in Congress assembled") drafted "a plan of confederacy for securing the freedom, sovereignty, and independence of the United States of America” (the states individually and severally); but with the Constitution of the United States, enacted in 1788, the Congress of the Confederation created a federal entity that benefited the cartel (by centralizing power, thus making it easier to control the U.S.A.). Clearly, the Congress of the Confederation violated the law of the land (the Articles of Confederation) by enacting the Constitution simply by declaring it to be so, and not by the requirements prescribed by the Articles of Confederation. The operational result was a usurpation of the rights of the U.S.A. by the cartel.[1] In the big picture, this was just another criminal act in a long series of criminal acts, though nevertheless a key one, both in terms of the cartel's perceived power and its illusory nature, since everything that follows is "fruit of the poisonous tree."
Once the federal government (U.S.) was so vested, the "invisible hand" of the cartel got down to the business of increasing it's power via control over national money creation, military and intelligence operations, the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, as well as through assassinations, economic sabotage, famine, war, election theft, bribery, and racketeering.
Despite their overriding power and cutthroat tactics, the cartel continued to meet resistance from a handful of Presidents and Congressmen--as we saw in the previous chapter--the prime examples being the push back against privately owned central banks from the likes of Madison, Jackson, Taylor, Lincoln, and Garfield. Nevertheless, the debt burden of the states continued to grow, through a cartel organized push for ill-conceived public works projects (as also mentioned in the previous chapter [here]), as well as the cartel's next war, that between the states.
As noted, the Civil War was the culmination of an attempt by the Anglo-European banking cartel to sever the unity of the states and drive the Union and the Confederacy into debt, in order to prevent the unbridled strength of the United States of America from issuing its own currency and driving the cartel's criminal conspiracy out of business.
Forcing the U.S. to issue bonds in exchange for currency
It appears that the banking cartel thought that Lincoln would have no choice but to borrow capital at the diabolical interest rate of 24 to 36 percent. But Lincoln and his advisers understood money and the Constitution better than the bankers anticipated, and chose to issue sovereign dollars (Greenbacks) to outfit and underwrite the Union Army.
In response, the cartel spent generously bribing the Congress to pass the next big legal breakthroughs in their conquest of the U.S.A: the National Banking Acts of 1863 and 1864, giving the cartel control over the money supply, by requiring the federal government (the U.S.) to issue bonds, and pay principal and interest on those bonds, in order to receive private bank notes, which had, in the absence of any further issuance of Lincoln's Greenbacks (following his assassination), become, by default, the unofficial legal tender for debts public and private.
Uncle Sam grants himself an enterprise zone
Seven years after the National Banking Acts, in 1871, the cartel, through its subordinate public sector legislators (the Congress), incorporated the District of Columbia, creating a faux governmental enterprise zone that they owned and operated through the legal entity of the U.S. Strategically, this gave the cartel's North American toehold, the U.S. (the federal government), its own land, separate from the United States of America (the states united and severable).
In other words, the the U.S. (the federal government) then owned and operated its own district (the District of Columbia). This is why it would be a foolish strategy, for the international banking cartel that controls the federal government, to make D.C. a state: because the federal government would then be only "renting space" from an independent state. In addition, such statehood would reduce D.C. to equal terms with the other states, putting at risk the illegal hierarchical legal structure that masks the cartel's criminal choke hold over the sovereign states.
Thus ensconced in their own plutocratic domain, the international banking cartel could now focus on their agenda for destroying any remaining sovereignty in the U.S.A.
The requirements for maintaining the "sound money" myth
One of the mythologies with which the cartel has been so successful down through the centuries is that of sound money. The pitch goes something like this: "These green pieces of paper are backed by gold, which has always been the measure of value." Without revisiting this sham (see our analysis here), suffice it to say that paper currencies have never been backed by gold on a one-to-one basis, but rather by the same fractional reserve method that originally enabled goldsmiths to take over the banking functions of the formerly sovereign states of Europe, i.e., holding only a portion of the currency's face value in gold.
Nevertheless, it was a convenient myth, since it allowed the central bankers--who control the markets for stocks, bonds, commodities (perishables and precious metals), and mortgages (MERS), as well as interest rates (LIBOR) [see a list of the frauds and market manipulations at the end of this post]--to move value from one currency to another via gold, or to use gold as a store of value while they speculated and destroyed currencies, as a run-up to stealing the natural resources and other assets from the nation-states of issue.
Given the limitation of the gold supply relative to the goods and services in circulation, as well as the cumbersome nature of exchanging gold, the bankers needed to create a single national bank note that would serve as an alternate to gold, a precious metal which they would rather reserve as the last resort store-of-value for that which they have stolen from labor.
One obstacle to this plan was the availability of silver ("free silver") across the general population, through mining claims and foundries (mints). Thus, in 1873, over strenuous protests that lasted decades, silver was demonetized, essentially making gold the monetary standard, thereby eliminating money creation outside of the cartel's purveyance.
At this point, in terms of legal status, in addition to the previously acquired and future usurped powers from the states, we now have the U.S. (the federal government) paying principal and interest to spend and circulate in the marketplace various private bank notes owned and operated by the cartel, with the further ruse that this paper is backed by gold. This sleight-of-hand continued on, even after the creation of the Federal Reserve System (1913), eventually and magically conjuring the illusion that Fort Knox was filled will a sufficient supply of gold to back all the Federal Reserve Notes in circulation.[2]
Bankruptcy of the United States
From our present vantage point, we can see that enforced bankruptcy strategies on the enemies of the cartel have been employed for centuries (Recently, these strategies have shifted from nation-states to states and cities, such as Detroit.). So, after 1913, with the cartel now in control of the central bank (the Federal Reserve System, or "the Fed"), which was selling private bank notes to the U.S.--and after the establishment of a federal income tax and the Internal Revenue Service, to pay the interest for the use of the cartel's green pieces of paper--the focus for bankrupting the U.S. shifted from the issuance of a single national private bank note (achieved) to maximizing the debt owed by the U.S. to the cartel.
And what better way to achieve this than creating the First World War?
The vampire squid and its tendrils
Wars, of course, are another of the cartel's tried and true tactics for quickly driving up debt. Government "leaders" are either on board with this program, or they are deposed and disposed.
Following the First World War, the Roaring Twenties--fueled by low margins (20% for purchasing securities)--ran up private personal and commercial debt, all the while creating a surfeit of collateralized assets, which were later acquired for mills on the dollar, when the cartel crashed the system and imposed the Great Depression on the planet.
During this severe contraction of the money supply, the U.S. (federal) government was in need of massive funds to rebuild the nation, while navigating between the cartel-manufactured twin terrors of fascism and Communism.[3] There was only one entity that possessed the license to print the requisite Federal Reserve Notes needed to pay for the New Deal, and that was the new master, the cartel, behind its pseudo-legal sanctification of the Fed as the central bank of the U.S.
Thus, FDR was at the helm of an insolvent public sector corporation, otherwise known as the U.S. There could be no other explanation, since the U.S. was not sovereign, by virtue of: 1) losing the right to print its own money in 1863 and 1864, and 2) having its currency formally usurped in 1913. Thus, forcing the U.S. into a form of national bankruptcy was presented as the only viable solution, so that the international banking cartel (Rothschilds, Rockefellers, etc.) gained effective receivership over the federal government. Whether or not this was a formal and legal receivership is beside the point, since it was the culmination of various criminal actions down through the centuries; but, nevertheless, it was, operationally, a receivership.
Beginning with the Emergency Banking Act, on March 9, 1933, which was followed by Executive Order 6102 [4]--criminalizing the possession of monetary gold by any individual, partnership, association, or corporation, with Congress passing a similar resolution in June 1933--the cartel was given carte blanche to loan to the U.S. whatever amount necessary to re-establish a banking system that guaranteed the banks' customer deposits and put the nation's labor force back to work. In the process, all gold money (other than collectibles) was to be turned over to the U.S. Thus, the faux currency of the U.S. (Federal Reserve Notes) took another step in detaching itself from gold, even as the cartel was stealing the gold it collected in the name of economic necessity. How could this be? Because monetized gold was, by edict, removed from the marketplace.
As a result of these "laws," a permanent debt relationship was established between the "too big to fail" banks that own the Federal Reserve--by virtue of their capitalization and control over the voting members of each Federal Reserve District (see report of the 1976 House of Representatives Committee on Banking)--and the legal entity of the U.S. (the federal government).
Where did all of the collected gold go?
Given the various intrigues regarding gold deposits, including the famous story of tungsten bars coated with gold, and the eventual (2004) bowing out of the City of London firm of NW Rothschild from setting the price of gold, the question of the destination of the gold collected by Roosevelt's dictum is a compelling mystery. But as noted above, there is never enough gold to back a currency, because the production of gold never equals the increase in goods and services being traded in the marketplace. That is why, when gold is made the only currency (such as when Parliament banned paper currencies in the American colonies), depressions always follow.
Yet, the ruse continued. In 1944, the Bretton Woods Conference (the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference) obligated each country to adopt a monetary policy that maintained the exchange rate, by tying its currency to gold, and made the IMF a backstop to bridge temporary imbalances of payments.
Then came the back end of the double switch--the final blow to the smoke and mirrors of "sound money"--when the cartel, acting through its proxy, Great Britain, asked the U.S. to redeem $3 billion in Federal Reserve Notes for gold (at $35 per ounce), "forcing" Nixon to detach FRNs from gold on August 15, 1971.
Essentially, the cartel was now admitting that Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) were a free-floating (private) fiat currency. Nevertheless, the result was to formally transfer the function of the lowest common denominator of value (world reserve currency) from gold to FRNs. In simple terms, this meant that the cartel owned the printing press for the currency with which they could buy, and thus control, the world. And gold? It had become a useful hedge when currencies needed to be attacked, to enable the theft of resources from the target nation-state of the moment.
What rule of law?
Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws! --Apocryphal quote attributed to Meyer Amschel Rothschild
So we see that by hijacking the legal framework of the U.S.A. (the sovereign states, united and severable) via a federal government, the cartel was able to privatize U.S. currency and leverage its private bank notes (FRNs) to buy up whatever other resources (natural and human) necessary to attain suzerainty over the U.S.A. and much of the world.
Undermining States' Rights
Due to the original sovereign standing of the states, united but severable, the next step in the cartel's strategy was the necessity for the cartel to alter state constitutions and city charters to ensure that all credit be licensed to private banks, rather than sovereign bodies politic and corporate.
Thus began the insertion of specific prohibitions into various existent and newly created state constitutions and city charters that prohibited these previously sovereign entities from creating banks that leveraged taxpayer dollars in the public interest; so, just as the (Articles of) Confederation was hijacked by the cartel's Constitution, a Federalist Trojan horse, so did the states and their legal frameworks fall victim to the cartel's statutory poison pill templates, much like ALEC and its derivative organizations continue to do today.
For example, in the Colorado Constitution--as interpreted by the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the Colorado state government--the state has no right to create a publicly owned bank that would "lend or pledge" the state's credit. What this means exactly is open to interpretation, which is how the cartel likes it, because if you control the players, legal gobbledygook gives them the leeway to make up the law as they go along, as we laid bare in the last chapter, regarding our efforts to get the question of a publicly owned state bank on the ballot through the initiative process. Ironically, a state bank would do exactly the opposite of pledging the state's credit: it would be facilitating loans where others pledge their credit, just like the Bank of North Dakota has done successfully for over 95 years.
Fascism and "the People's Republic of Boulder"
The same holds true at the county and city level--jurisdictions that have fallen like dominoes to the cartel's American version of fascism (corporate control over the state)--even those that see themselves as progressive; for example, in the City of Boulder, Colorado and Boulder County, Colorado, we see how pressure exerted by the cartel prevents progressive evolutionary development.
After the citizens of the City of Boulder twice defeating Xcel Energy in their drive to create a city-owned public utility that would accelerate the timeline for the use of renewable energy to power the local grid, the banking empire struck back using their now government-admitted HAARP weapon to bring a "1,000-year flood"--a stationary weather pattern drawing upon moist gulf air to destroy the canyons, cities, and plains of Boulder County--to drive up the debt of the locals to the cartel. It should also be noted that the second electoral defeat of Xcel Energy came with a price, an Xcel sponsored debt limitation initiative designed to hamstring the city's efforts.
One would hope that such an anomalistic event would raise local consciousness regarding the technological power of the cartel, as well as the seriousness with which they defend their choke hold over most of the planet. Unfortunately, Boulder's radicalism has, since the '60's, generally confined itself to environmental issues, not political and economic ones. Of course, there are many who cannot conceive of "the U.S. government" doing anything to its allies and citizens, but this is a misconception of the power structure. To the cartel, any take-back of assets (banking, energy generation, etc.) is seen as an enemy act. To maintain the charade of nation-states and old enmities, "invisible" weapons are used, and one of those weapons is weather and geologic events. As noted here, Japan, New Zealand, and others have felt this wrath.
The City of Boulder and Boulder County are in a perfect situation to leverage public banking to underwrite the build-out of a publicly owned utility, a strategy that would allow the work to be completed at half the cost; yet, neither the CFO of the City nor the Treasurer of the County, based upon our conversations with them, were willing to consider such an option. In addition, the City of Boulder has let the cartel's disruption of its tax base (the 2008 money supply contraction) create a dependency on corporate programs that prey upon citizens; for example, allowing corporate traffic monitoring systems to be set with short yellow light durations to drive up ticket revenues and increase accident probability. While Boulder still has a much better tax base than Detroit, it is no less a public sector subsidiary of the cartel (and here). Another example is the county's use of JPMorgan Chase credit cards to distribute heat and food subsidies for the poor. Why should the cartel profit on this?
"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." --Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom: A Call For the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People, Section I: "The Old Order Changeth," p. 13
"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains set lightly upon you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." --Samuel Adams
"Of course we will have fascism in America but we will call it democracy!" --Huey Long
But the subversion of law and representative government is only one area in which the destruction of reasoning and language enables the destruction of freedom.
Science in Advanced Fascist Societies
Using the term "science" or "scientific" these days tends to draw allegiance from those who believe that such terminology somehow guarantees a reasoned approach to the data under consideration; but, as history has shown, scientific standards are, each in their own time, often not much different than religious dogma, in the sense that what is insisted upon turns out to be inaccurate or wrong; worse, science is often subordinated to the objectives of those who own and control the state (and here); for example, in Nazi Germany (Einstein's theories were derided as "Jewish science") and in the U.S. as well.
Take the issue of climate change. Those who believe that it is a scientific fact that the burning of fossil fuels is causing global warming, and who ridicule anyone who believes otherwise, are missing a few key facts that belie any pretense of their "scientific method."
The known data includes: the burning of fossil fuels and the attendant smog, as well as various measurements such as average temperatures in various locales and extreme weather, including severe droughts, floods, earthquakes, tsunamis, etc.
Those proscribing to "global warming" express the aforementioned data as: the burning of fossil fuels = global warming and extreme weather. This line of reasoning, if it can be called that, leaves out major factors, including the capability of military and intelligence programs to create weather and geologic events as weapons. Of course, the standard "scientific" response to this is to fall back on that common logical fallacy of ad hominem, using it in the form of calling their detractors "conspiracy theorists." But now that government scientists have admitted to what they call geo-engineering--not to mention that, in the late 1990's, the EU Parliament asked the U.S. to come clean on its HAARP program and the Canadian Broadcasting System did a documentary on HAARP--such ad hominem holds no water. If there is any conspiracy here, it is that of so-called scientists promulgating ignorance of the political, economic, and military/intelligence forces to which we are subject.
Similarly, campaigns and elections involving the so-called "two party system" ignore the influence of the cartel and its long reach through cross ownership and interlocking directorates--including the media, polling organizations, and voting machines--when discussing the published vote totals. Elections where electronic voting machines tabulate the votes are not verifiable. In fact, it has been shown over and over that the hacking of electronic voting machines is the norm, not the aberration.
So much for "science" as it is practiced by those whose understanding of the power structure never ventures outside the box of corporate-owned media and education, or by those who are paid to obfuscate the truth.
What is "scientific method" or empiricism?
Scientific method is nothing more than a means to ask and answer questions by making observations and doing experiments. In general, the steps of the scientific method are to:
* Ask a question
* Do background research
* Construct a hypothesis, including a control group
* Test your hypothesis by doing an experiment
* Analyze your data and draw a conclusion
* Communicate your results [5]
* Update your hypothesis as data reveals new actions/behaviors
In other words, scientific method is, at its best, an operational truth, that works until it doesn't. One of the most common flaws in scientific methodology is to ignore having a control group, or to choose a control group that is missing key factors, as in our example above regarding climate change.
Therefore, when you read that a climate model "proves" global warming, you know immediately that such a statement is non-scientific. A model or a hypothesis cannot "prove" anything, only venture to show a process that generates the data. But data can invalidate a hypothesis or model, just as Einstein described the "key" to empiricism when he said:
"The case is never closed."and
"Many experiments may prove me right but it takes only one to prove me wrong." [6]
The politics of science and the science of politics
The means of funding contemporary scientific research is, principally, the federal government, with additional hefty supplements from large foundations. Both of these sources have specific political agendas based on their owners and controllers, who are, generally speaking, the same set of persons. As we noted here, their objectives are, simply stated: power, profit, propaganda, and population reduction.
As a result, contemporary science serves the objectives of a very small minority (.00001%), and not the objectives of the people (99.99999%) and the evolution of human consciousness and its application in the public interest; i.e., "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."
The bottom line
In a fascist society, information and technology derived from scientific research is always vetted first for its military application, to ensure that a very small number of people are able to maintain their hegemony over the human race. When such information and technology is released to the public, usually decades after its discovery and development, any public use will be limited in some manner; for example, allowing intelligence organizations access to all Internet and cell phone activity.
As we have seen throughout this book, the root cause of global dysfunction at every level is private control over money creation and the leveraging of this into legal, political, economic, military, and scientific control. While this consolidation of power may seem insurmountable, history shows, if nothing else, that such immutable judgements are never accurate. So, what tools do we have to address the restoration of law and scientific method?
Education and legal recourse
Given the power of the banking cartel and the present allegiance of the military and police to this criminal conspiracy, the first objective in changing the present dystopia--before we can invoke Justice Jackson's comments at the beginning of this chapter--must be in educating large numbers of people.
In terms of the law, there are a few tactics that, if employed by the people locally across the nation, could serve to educate the unaware as to the current power structure and the objectives of those at the top. These include:
Common law grand juries: Although these citizen initiatives have come to be associated with reactionary organizations that combine anti-government sentiments and bigotry, the framework of these bodies is such that they can be used by progressives to seek remedy from the misuse of our government through criminal usurpation. For example:
Given the repetitive premeditated frauds of the financial services industry, it would make sense to charge the executives of the "too-big-to-fail" banks with racketeering; or,Given the amoral, psychopathic, and sociopathic behavior of banking executives (and here), petitions re the criminally insane would also be in order.
Citizens in a few states have found an additional way to circumvent prosecutors and police who are beholden to the money masters.
Another generally unknown power is that of jury annulment of laws, which allows any jury to to announce an accused as "not culprit," even if the jury knows that the accused is guilty according the law as it is written. For example:
Given the unjust manner in which the banks and their corporations have usurped the sovereignty of the people of the United States of America, almost any law enacted and used against the people and not applied to the elite and their corporations, including the Internal Revenue Code, could be seen to be unjust, or even unconstitutional.An additional strategy is the formation of the "National General Assembly of the United States" (NGAOTUS). Here’s the idea:
* Article V of the US Constitution provides a few different means for passing amendments. In addition to ¾ of the state legislatures passing an amendment, there is a provision for “conventions” in ¾ of the states. There is no specification for who can hold these conventions.
* NGAOTUS would attempt to be incorporated under 5 USC 104 as an Independent Establishment of the Federal Government.
* NGAOTUS would then organize conventions in the 50 states. Each of the conventions would vote on the same amendment, which would include all the necessary stipulations to change the banking and monetary systems, hold verifiable elections, and decentralize the media.
* If these amendments pass ¾ of the conventions, we would have enforceable Constitutional stipulations that would override US Code.Finally, one power that is beginning to get traction is the U.S. constitutional guarantee of state and local powers that supersede federal powers, including that of county sheriffs as the highest law enforcement officer within their jurisdiction. While this movement originated with conservative organizations, we hope that liberals, as well as those outside the manufactured political consensus of the red and blue parties, will take note that the federal government has recognized its own limits as well as the power of county sheriffs within their jurisdiction. Even if we find other rulings by this court to be reprehensible, it would be foolish for us to ignore the opportunity and fortuitous opinion expressed, in the case of Mack/Printz v. USA (in which portions of the Brady bill were declared unconstitutional), by Scalia and the majority:
Writing for the majority, Justice Scalia opined:
"... the Constitution's conferral upon Congress of not all governmental powers, but only discreet, enumerated ones."Clearly, the office of county sheriff, by law and in practice, holds supreme authority within its jurisdiction.Also, citing the Tenth Amendment, which affirms the limited powers doctrine, Scalia wrote that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution ... are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
"It is incontestable that the Constitution established a system of dual sovereignty" and that the states retained "a residuary and inviolable sovereignty."
He goes further and cites James Madison, considered to be the father of our Constitution: "The local or municipal authorities form distinct and independent portions of the supremacy, no more subject, within their respective spheres, to the general authority [federal government] than the general authority is subject to them, within its own sphere." (The Federalist #39);
The majority opinion goes on to say that "This separation of the two spheres is one of the constitution's structural protections of liberty. Just as the separation and independence of the coordinate branches of the federal government serve to prevent the accumulation of excessive power in any one branch, a healthy balance of power between the States and the Federal Government will reduce the risk of tyranny and abuse from either front."
Scalia again quotes Madison, who says, "Hence, a double security arises to the rights of the people. The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself." (The Federalist #51) Essentially, this means that the state and county governments are actually and literally charged with controlling the federal government. To do so is, as emphasized above, "one of the Constitution's structural protections of liberty."
Escape from manufactured consensus
For these tools to be effective, however, requires that sufficient numbers of people understand:
* The cartel--through ownership of the media, polling organizations, and electronic voting machines, in addition to the educational process--aims to make citizens feel that they are part of a powerless minority; for example, take this article that appeared in the Huffington Post concerning citizen support for the Keystone Pipeline. Note:(1) that the Huffington Post is using its own polling organization;
(2) that the Huffington Post is owned by AOL, which, along with Time Warner, was previously one of only six companies that controlled all mass media the U.S.;
(3) that less than half the people polled knew anything about the pipeline and that, presumably, most of those who did got their information from one of the six companies that controlled the mass media;What is this if not manufactured consensus, just as Herbert Marcuse discussed in One-Dimensional Man (1964)?
* The root cause of global dysfunction is private control over money creation; and
* The necessity for their own spiritual evolution, which we shall detail in the next chapter, the seventh and final step required for global transformation.
Footnotes:
[1] "The legislatures, unfortunately, mostly appointed their delegates [Founding Fathers] from among their local wealthy elite. The delegates then ensconced themselves in secret session and proceeded to betray the charter under which they had been assembled. They discarded the Articles, and began debating and drafting a wholly new document, one that transferred sovereignty to a relatively strong central government. The delegates reneged on the States that had sent them, and took it upon themselves to speak directly for "We the People." Thus begins the preamble to their Constitution. In effect they accomplished a coup d’etat. They managed to design a system that would enable existing elites to continue to run the affairs of the new nation, as they had before under the Crown, under a Constitution that for all the world seems to embody sound democratic principles. The system was consciously designed to facilitate elite rule and that is how it has functioned ever since." -- Richard K. Moore, Escaping the Matrix - Global Transformation: Why we need it and how we can get it, The Cyberjournal Project, December 16, 2005.
[2] There is no legitimate audit, from past or present, that vouches for the quantity and quality of these reserves.
[3] It is well documented that the Union Banking Corporation (the Bushes, the Harrimans, and the Dulles brothers) invested in and laundered money for Fritz Thyssen and the Nazi war machine, not to mention the outright support by Standard Oil (supplying oil) and IBM (keeping track of concentration camp prisoners) for the Nazis; it's also worth noting that the western bankers backed Lenin, in order to overthrow the provisional Russian government under Kerensky, which had established a state-owned central bank.
[4] In all, the related legislation included Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260, House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933 confirmed in Perry v. U.S. (1935) 294 U.S. 330-381, 79 LEd 912, as well as 31 United States Code (USC) 5112, 5119 and 12 USC 95a.
[5]http://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/project_scientific_method.shtml
[6]http://climateclash.com/2-the-scientific-method/
[7]http://www.news10.net/story/news/investigations/watchdog/2014/03/06/cellphone-spying-technology-used-throughout-northern-california/6144949/
Copyright, Robert Bows, 2014
# # #
[The forgoing article is an excerpt from our new book, 7 Steps to Global Economic and Spiritual Transformation, which is now available online at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and other sites.]
No comments:
Post a Comment