August 21, 2018

Overview of Step 2 -- Rejecting the false divisions of ethnicities, religions, political parties, and nationalities

[We are pleased to announce that our book, 7 Steps to Global Economic and Spiritual Transformation, is now available online at Amazon and at Barnes and Noble.]

The following is an overview of the second chapter in our book:


George Orwell

In our new book, 7 Steps to Global Economic and Spiritual Transformation, we identify and discuss concepts that are integral to humanity surviving its current crisis in a progressive and sustainable manner. The first six steps involve collective issues that must be understood by individuals, and the seventh step is one that each of us must take individually.

As we discussed in Step 1—Exposing the story of money and usury, humanistic values have been supplanted by the exigencies of capital, which is money (value created by labor) that has been converted into a commodity by charging interest for its use.

To accomplish this, the central bankers, whose financial resources are bottomless, purchased and developed a sophisticated matrix of scientific, educational, journalistic, political, economic, medical, and religious organizations and rationalizations—all serving to support this inversion of value.

So, in this installment, Step 2 – Rejecting the false divisions of ethnicities, religions, political parties, and nationalities, we are going to take a high-level view of how the Anglo-Euro-American banking cartel and its corporate network leverages its power to maintain this illusory version of reality.

One of the central methodologies that the cartel uses to promulgate their PSYOPS and propaganda is conflating various independent ideas and groups into catch phrases by which they manipulate large segments of the population, to keep them inside various mental silos that they control economically, politically, militarily, etc.

The most obvious example, here in the U.S., is the so-called two party system. Ostensibly, the blue and red party marketing brands (what used to be called the Democratic and Republican parties, labels which are no longer applicable; for example, the red-baiting blue party are now what used to be the red party McCarthyites) are selling two different approaches to political and economic policy: equality and economic justice for the blue party and inequality and economic injustice for the red party, but an examination of the actual effects of the legislation and policies coming out of the Beltway show that both brands support the same objectives.

Beginning with Bill Clinton’s crime bill, the incarceration of African-Americans has continued to expand; beginning with George W. Bush, surveillance and the shredding of the Constitution has continued to expand; and, beginning with George W. Bush, global warfare for control of central banking and oil and gold reserves has continued to expand. The expansion of these criminal initiatives has occurred under both blue and red branded presidential puppets.

Much like Orwell’s Oceania in 1984, today’s political landscape consists of only one Party under which the mirage of choice is actually a manufactured consensus. As Orwell noted in his seminal work, Politics and the English Language, “If thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought,” and certainly the inability of large swaths of supposedly educated persons to see through the red and blue charade testifies to effectiveness of this web of conceptual manipulation.

Another obvious example of such conflation is the global debate over events in the Middle East. Generally, the conflicts are divided into Israel versus Palestine and the U.S. versus Iran, Hezbollah, and ISIS, but such characterizations gloss over a multitude of political, economic, religious, and ethnic conflicts.

In reality, there are a number of long-standing wars, conflicts, and enmities in the Levant: one between three religions—Islam, Christianity, and Judaism—including fighting between different sects of each; various deep-seated ethnic hostilities; and the 500-year old war between the Anglo-Euro-American banking cartel and sovereign nations that control their own central banks and currencies.

Yet, in both the corporate mass and social media, as well as in the so-called progressive press, the Israel-Palestine issues are seen purely in political terms on an abbreviated timeline, which is, of course, why all solutions have failed.

Meanwhile, the actions of the cartel’s mercenary forces—troops from the so-called “governments” of the U.S., U.K., France, Saudi Arabia, and Israel—are characterized in the corporate mass and social media as fighting terrorists, rather than having created the terrorist groups as an excuse to destroy sovereign nations, replace their banking systems, and steal their oil and gold reserves.

All of this leads back to the central thesis of our book, that the root cause of global dysfunction is private control over money creation, and that in addition to understanding how this dynamic dictates almost every political, economic, and military conflict on the planet, we must also each evolve spiritually to defuse the religious hubris that is, in many cases, conflated with the root cause.

# # #



[We are pleased to announce that our book, 7 Steps to Global Economic and Spiritual Transformation, is now available online at Amazon and at Barnes and Noble. The foregoing article is based on the precepts of our book. ]

2 comments:

  1. Would de-centralizing the money creation be better than re-allocating central money-printing power to the state from the Fed? In other words letting private enterprise 'compete' to create currencies. A certain company filing copyright infringement lawsuite etc against someone counterfeiting their privately created currency. In other words, removing the Fed's monopoly pricing power. The reason I suggest this is because the central banks keep coming back each time we abolish them, 30 years later, they're baaaaack!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sovereign money is issued by the sovereign entity. If the Fed were nationalized, then the people would, once again be sovereign and the currency would change from private bank notes (for which the people are charged principal and interest) to actual U.S. dollars, and the national debt would be retired in short order. The new public banking network would extend from the Fed to regional banks to state banks to county and municipal banks; but, coordination regarding inflation and deflation would need to be monitored across the entire currency (nationally), although adjustments in the money supply would be made at a local level. Private parties would be prohibited from creating money, since they turn money (the value created by labor) into a commodity (capital) via interest. Also, you are incorrect in stating "the central banks keep coming back." The Anglo-Euro-American banking cartel has been around for 500 years. It's time to dismantle it. Here is my take on how the process would look: http://coloradopublicbanking.blogspot.com/2018/06/transforming-us-and-global-economy.html

    ReplyDelete